CONTRIBUTORS

Kim Catechis
Investment Strategist,
Franklin Templeton Investment Institute

Lukasz Labedzki, CFA
Senior Analyst
Franklin Templeton Institute
Preview
Our definition of assets and their economic value has been changing over time. In the 20th century, machines, factories, and transportation were the assets on a company’s balance sheet. Today, value is dominated by intangibles. Brands, technologies, patents, copyrights, synergies, and business models determine the lion’s share of company worth. At this point, 90% of the capitalization of the S&P 500 Index is accounted for by intangibles,1 a huge jump from 36% in 1985.
This paper builds on the technological innovation and taxation themes presented in Deep Water Waves, a paper published by the Franklin Templeton Investment Institute, to explore the definition of intangible assets and draws conclusions on the implications for investors. Further, the paper dovetails with the Investment Institute’s Franklin Templeton Thinks Equity Markets piece, Growth or value? For active managers it can be both. All things considered, the evolving treatment of intangible assets may be one of the most impactful trends in the global economy, making them impossible to ignore.
ENDNOTE
- Source: Analysis by Franklin Templeton Investment Institute, FactSet. As of 12/31/2020.
WHAT ARE THE RISKS?
All investments involve risks, including possible loss of principal. The value of investments can go down as well as up, and investors may not get back the full amount invested. The positioning of a specific portfolio may differ from the information presented herein due to various factors, including, but not limited to, allocations from the core portfolio and specific investment objectives, guidelines, strategy and restrictions of a portfolio. There is no assurance any forecast, projection or estimate will be realised. Bond prices generally move in the opposite direction of interest rates. Thus, as prices of bonds in an investment portfolio adjust to a rise in interest rates, the value of the portfolio may decline. Stock prices fluctuate, sometimes rapidly and dramatically, due to factors affecting individual companies, particular industries or sectors or general market conditions. Investing in the natural resources sector involves special risks, including increased susceptibility to adverse economic and regulatory developments affecting the sector. Growth stock prices may fall dramatically if the company fails to meet projections of earnings or revenue; their prices may be more volatile than other securities, particularly over the short term. Small- and mid-capitalization companies can be particularly sensitive to changing economic conditions, and their prospects for growth are less certain than those of larger, more established companies. Special risks are associated with investing in foreign securities, including risks associated with political and economic developments, trading practices, availability of information, limited markets and currency exchange rate fluctuations and policies; investments in emerging markets involve heightened risks related to the same factors. China may be subject to considerable degrees of economic, political and social instability. Investments in securities of Chinese issuers involve risks that are specific to China, including certain legal, regulatory, political and economic risks. Actively managed strategies could experience losses if the investment manager’s judgment about markets, interest rates or the attractiveness, relative values, liquidity or potential appreciation of particular investments made for a portfolio, proves to be incorrect. There can be no guarantee that an investment manager’s investment techniques or decisions will produce the desired results. Investments in fast-growing industries like the technology and health care sectors (which have historically been volatile) could result in increased price fluctuation, especially over the short term, due to the rapid pace of product change and development and changes in government regulation of companies emphasizing scientific or technological advancement or regulatory approval for new drugs and medical instruments. Impact investing and/or Environmental, Social and Governance (ESG) managers may take into consideration factors beyond traditional financial information to select securities, which could result in relative investment performance deviating from other strategies or broad market benchmarks, depending on whether such sectors or investments are in or out of favour in the market. Further, ESG strategies may rely on certain values-based criteria to eliminate exposures found in similar strategies or broad market benchmarks, which could also result in relative investment performance deviating.
Any companies and/or case studies referenced herein are used solely for illustrative purposes; any investment may or may not be currently held by any portfolio advised by Franklin Templeton. The information provided is not a recommendation or individual investment advice for any particular security, strategy, or investment product and is not an indication of the trading intent of any Franklin Templeton managed portfolio.
