Skip to content

Small-caps roar back in 4Q23

After stumbling into the quarter, small-cap stocks rallied significantly off their 2023 low in October for a double-digit gain in 4Q23, with the Russell 2000 Index advancing 14.0% to see out 2023. Small-cap stocks showed strength on both an absolute and relative basis, as the Russell 2000 outpaced both the large-cap Russell 1000 and mega-cap Russell Top 50 Indexes, which gained 12.0% and 10.9% respectively for the quarter.

With the Federal Reserve (Fed) mostly committed to no longer hiking rates, a robust showing from domestic equities was hardly surprising. The outperformance for small-caps, however, was arguably more unexpected—though from our perspective long overdue. The year’s final quarter also saw the 10-year Treasury yield fall by more than 100 basis points, from 4.98% in mid-October to 3.84% by the end of December.

Small-caps have miles to go before overtaking large-caps

Thanks to its stellar fourth quarter, the Russell 2000 was no longer in a bear market at the end of 2023, though the small-cap index remained down -14.3% from its last peak on 11/8/21. In addition, while the rally was welcome, even small-cap’s excellent concluding quarter could not lift its calendar-year returns above large-cap’s. The Russell 2000 remained well behind its large-cap sibling for 2023—up 16.9% versus 26.5%—as well as for the 3-, 5-, and 10-year periods ended 12/31/23.

Small-Cap’s Quarterly Strength in an Underperforming Year

Russell 2000 and Russell 1000 Returns for 4Q23 and 2023

Source: Russell Investments. Past performance is not an indicator or a guarantee of future performance.

Their own noteworthy quarterly rebound notwithstanding—the Russell Microcap Index rose 16.1% in 4Q23—micro-caps had underwhelming long-term results. The Russell Microcap increased only 0.6% for the 3-year period and only 5.8% for the 10-year period ended 12/31/23.

Non-US small-caps win for both 4Q23 and 2023

Small-caps outside the US held smaller advantages in both 4Q23 and 2023. For the fourth quarter, the MSCI ACWI ex-US Small Cap Index gained 10.1% versus 9.7% for the MSCI ACWI ex-US Large Cap Index. For the calendar year, the advantage was even narrower, with the non-US small-cap index up 15.7% while its large-cap sibling rose 15.5%.

Small-cap value beat growth

Although both small-cap style indexes did well in 4Q23, the advantage was squarely in small-cap value’s favor, with the Russell 2000 Value Index advancing 15.3% versus 12.7% for the Russell 2000 Growth Index. It’s comparatively rare for small-cap value to best small-cap growth in a positive quarter, particularly one with double-digit gains. It’s happened in 41 of 118 positive, quarters, or 35% of the time since the Russell 2000’s inception on 12/31/78.

The Russell 2000 Value also led from the previous 2023 small-cap high on July 31st, up 4.0% versus -0.2% through the end of December. For 2023 as a whole, however, growth led, gaining 18.7% versus 14.6%. It’s worth noting that 2023’s results contributed to something of a sawtooth pattern of relative performance. The Russell 2000 Value led for the 3-year (in which the Russell 2000 Growth lost -3.5%) and 5-year periods while small-cap growth, in addition to its 1-year advantage, also outperformed for the 10-year period ended 12/31/23.

The small-cap sector story

There were interesting contrasts in sector leadership in the Russell 2000 between 4Q23’s rally and the year as a whole. Boosted by banks, the financials sector was the clear winner in 4Q23, up 21.6%, while energy was the only sector with a loss for the quarter, down -5.9%. The next-best sectors in 4Q23 were consumer discretionary and real estate. All told, eight of the 11 sectors in the small-cap index scored double-digit gains in 4Q23.

For the calendar year, information technology, consumer discretionary, and industrials did best. Utilities finished 2023 in the red, while healthcare and communication services notched the smallest gains. As was the case in 4Q23, eight of 11 sectors had double-digit gains for the calendar year. And while cyclical and defensive stocks were almost even for 4Q23—which gives some idea of how broad-based returns were in the quarter—cyclicals had a decisive advantage for the calendar year.

Valuations for small-cap are highly attractive vs. large-cap

We think it bears repeating that, even with a terrific 4Q23 and a positive return in 2023, the Russell 2000 finished the year well shy of its 11/8/21 peak—while large-caps continued to establish new highs in 4Q23. In fact, it’s been 563 days since the current cycle low for the Russell 2000—the third longest span without recovering the prior peak on record.

Fallout from the Internet Bubble saw small-caps need 456 days from their trough to match their previous peak, while it took 704 days for small-caps to recover their prior peak following their trough in the 2008-09 Financial Crisis. Each of these periods saw dramatic developments: the implosion of high-flying technology stocks in 2000-02 and a global financial catastrophe in 2008-09. The current period has seen ample uncertainty, and a record pace of interest rate increases yet lacks the existential threats that characterized the Internet Bubble and, even more so, the Financial Crisis. The latter period also saw less bifurcation between small- and large-cap returns. Yet based on our preferred index valuation metric of enterprise value to earnings before interest and taxes, or EV/EBIT, the Russell 2000 finished 2023 not far from its 25-year low relative to the Russell 1000.

Russell 2000 vs. Russell 1000 Median LTM EV/EBIT* (ex. Negative EBIT Companies)

12/31/98-12/31/23

*Last twelve months enterprise value/earnings before interest and taxes. Source: Russell Investments. Past performance is not an indicator or a guarantee of future performance.

Similarly, small-cap value continued to sell at a below average valuation relative to small-cap growth at the end of the year, as measured by EV/EBIT. Micro-cap stocks also remained very attractively valued relative to large-cap based on EV/EBIT. As small-cap specialists, we see these gaps in valuation and long-term performance as revealing the considerable long-term opportunities that still exist within the small- and micro-cap asset classes—especially when stacked against their large- and mega-cap counterparts.

The runway for small-cap performance looks long

While always cautious about reading too much into a short-term performance period such as a single quarter, we believe that a leadership shift is upon us. We see more than just a short-term reversal in 4Q23’s results, in which returns were higher the further down the capitalization scale one traveled. We suspect that returns are likely to skew more widely over the next few years and that the reign of the Magnificent Seven—the mega-cap cohort of Alphabet, Amazon, Apple, Meta, Microsoft, Nvidia, and Tesla—may be over.

Against the backdrop of moderating inflation, normalized interest rates, and a still growing US economy, it looks to us that small-cap’s lengthy stretch in the relative performance wilderness has run its course. Our reasoning is rooted in the notion that as the economy continues to stabilize, valuations are likely to rise for those businesses that have largely sat out the mega-cap performance regime. Such a move is likely to benefit small-caps more than larger companies. And large-cap cycles have historically peaked at market tops crowded with mega-caps.

Moreover, our research shows that when large-cap returns broaden, small-caps outperform. When the equal-weighted Russell 1000 beat the capitalization-weighted Russell 1000, the Russell 2000 outperformed the large-cap index over the majority of 1-, 3-, and 5-year rolling periods going back to 1984.

When the Equal-Weighted Russell 1000 Outperformed, Small-Cap Led in Most Periods

1-Year Average Monthly Rolling Return Periods When the Equal-Weighted Russell 1000 Index Outperformed the Capitalization-Weighted Russell 1000, 12/31/84-12/31/23

Source: Russell Investments. Past performance is not an indicator or a guarantee of future performance.

Finally, on 11/14/23, the Russell 2000 had a single day gain of 5.5%. Aside from being an extraordinarily positive day, our research found that previous days when the small-cap index scored gains of 5% or higher, it generally set the stage for outsized positive returns for the subsequent 1-year period, as the chart below details. While certainly no guarantee of positive performance over the next 12 months, we found the data compelling.

Small-Caps Often Had Strong Subsequent 1-Year Returns Following Single Day Gains of at Least 5%

1-Year Returns for the Russell 2000 Following Days with Gains of 5% or Higher Through 12/31/23 (%)

Source: Russell Investments. Past performance is not an indicator or a guarantee of future performance.

An active advantage?

We think that one important consequence of interest rates normalizing is that access to capital now has real costs—which should benefit conservatively capitalized, fiscally prudent small-cap companies and the asset managers who hold them. The mounting costs of indebtedness mean that advantages should accrue to companies with low debt, the ability to generate free cash flow, and the proven ability to allocate capital prudently and effectively.

As bottom-up small-cap stock pickers, however, an equally significant factor for us is that most of the management teams we’ve been speaking to remain cautiously optimistic over the long run. With no recession having materialized after nearly three years after its imminent arrival being predicted, we see the increasing likelihood of a soft landing for the resilient US economy—which will begin to see more tangible benefits of reshoring, the CHIPS Act, and numerous infrastructure projects in 2024. And while we are very pleased that performance has been strong across our domestic Strategies on both an absolute and relative basis for the 1-,3-, 5-, and 10-year periods ended 12/31/23, we are more optimistic about the long-term prospects for select small-caps than we have been in several years.



IMPORTANT LEGAL INFORMATION

This material is intended to be of general interest only and should not be construed as individual investment advice or a recommendation or solicitation to buy, sell or hold any security or to adopt any investment strategy. It does not constitute legal or tax advice. This material may not be reproduced, distributed or published without prior written permission from Franklin Templeton.

The views expressed are those of the investment manager and the comments, opinions and analyses are rendered as at publication date and may change without notice. The underlying assumptions and these views are subject to change based on market and other conditions and may differ from other portfolio managers or of the firm as a whole. The information provided in this material is not intended as a complete analysis of every material fact regarding any country, region or market. There is no assurance that any prediction, projection or forecast on the economy, stock market, bond market or the economic trends of the markets will be realized. The value of investments and the income from them can go down as well as up and you may not get back the full amount that you invested. Past performance is not necessarily indicative nor a guarantee of future performance. All investments involve risks, including possible loss of principal.

Any research and analysis contained in this material has been procured by Franklin Templeton for its own purposes and may be acted upon in that connection and, as such, is provided to you incidentally. Data from third party sources may have been used in the preparation of this material and Franklin Templeton ("FT") has not independently verified, validated or audited such data. Although information has been obtained from sources that Franklin Templeton believes to be reliable, no guarantee can be given as to its accuracy and such information may be incomplete or condensed and may be subject to change at any time without notice. The mention of any individual securities should neither constitute nor be construed as a recommendation to purchase, hold or sell any securities, and the information provided regarding such individual securities (if any) is not a sufficient basis upon which to make an investment decision. FT accepts no liability whatsoever for any loss arising from use of this information and reliance upon the comments, opinions and analyses in the material is at the sole discretion of the user.

Franklin Templeton has environmental, social and governance (ESG) capabilities; however, not all strategies or products for a strategy consider “ESG” as part of their investment process.

Products, services and information may not be available in all jurisdictions and are offered outside the U.S. by other FT affiliates and/or their distributors as local laws and regulation permits. Please consult your own financial professional or Franklin Templeton institutional contact for further information on availability of products and services in your jurisdiction.

Issued in the U.S.: Franklin Resources, Inc. and its subsidiaries offer investment management services through multiple investment advisers registered with the SEC. Franklin Distributors, LLC and Putnam Retail Management LP, members FINRA/SIPC, are Franklin Templeton broker/dealers, which provide registered representative services.  Franklin Templeton, One Franklin Parkway, San Mateo, California 94403-1906, (800) DIAL BEN/342-5236, franklintempleton.com.

This site is intended only for U.S. Institutional Investors and Consultants. Using it means you agree to our Terms of Use.

If you would like information on Franklin Templeton’s retail mutual funds, please visit www.franklintempleton.com.

CFA® and Chartered Financial Analyst® are trademarks owned by CFA Institute.